Blueprint Compliance Engine™
The work compliance teams hate. Automated. You verify and decide. Six automations: regulatory surveillance, classification, the canonical compliance graph, evidence quality scoring, product-change impact, Decision Pack generation.
Compliance as manual reconstruction. Five taxes paid on every audit.
Every compliance question is a multi-day reconstruction across systems that don't share a data model.
TAX 01
Fragmentation
50+ regulations per product across 10 markets, each tracked in a different folder by a different team.
TAX 02
Versioning
“We are compliant” is meaningless without product version, market, and effective date. Systems don’t track this.
TAX 03
Evidence quality
Most certificates pass expiry checks but fail audit — wrong test method, wrong configuration, marketing-grade declarations.
TAX 04
Product change
BOM swaps, supplier changes, firmware updates break compliance more often than regulatory change. Compliance is the last to know.
TAX 05
The audit
Technical Files reconstructed from scratch, every time. Sent as “best available reconstruction.”
The six automations. Every claim bound to a product version, a market, evidence, and a date.
Each described the same way: the work today, what Blueprint does, what is left for the human to decide. Tiles shaded below get the deep-dive next.
Regulatory Surveillance
Continuously monitors regulatory updates across markets, scores relevance to your product portfolio, and shows semantic changes rather than generic alerts.
Mapping & Classification
Decomposes product components, materials, effects, intended use, and market scope; every classification carries rationale and a sensitivity score.
Compliance Graph
Stores Market → Regulation → Obligation → Evidence → versioned Product → Claim as a typed, queryable compliance graph.
Evidence Quality Scoring
Scores accreditation scope, test-method match, configuration match, provenance, declaration grade, and validity windows, naming every weak axis.
Product-Change Impact
Turns BOM, supplier, firmware, packaging, and process changes into Change Deltas, regulatory impacts, owners, and tracked tasks.
Decision Pack Generation
Generates one current artifact per product, variant, and market with status, confidence, actions, evidence, rationale, and effective date.
Mapping & Classification.
Effect-based discovery: which regulations apply, in which markets, with rationale.
THE WORK TODAY
Engineer sends a new product spec. Regulatory affairs walks the spec against a checklist of frameworks for each target market. Obvious cases are easy. Borderline cases — RED Article 3.3(d)? MDR class? machinery scope? — get sent to external counsel, guessed, or punted. Wrong classification invalidates everything downstream.
A guessed classification poisons the rest of the file.
WHAT BLUEPRINT DOES
Effect-based discovery decomposes the product into components, materials, effects (RF, chemical, energy, intended use), per-market scope. A dedicated Classification step resolves: product category, HS code, regulated device class, intended-use scope, user-type scope. Every classification carries an explicit rationale and a sensitivity score — telling you when it's safe to automate vs. requires SME sign-off.
Rationale + sensitivity score on every classification.
WHAT’S LEFT FOR YOU
→ Approve confident classifications. → SME-sign-off the borderline ones. → Rationale on record for every decision. When a regulator or auditor asks, the answer is a query, not a meeting.
When the auditor asks: a query, not a meeting.
Compliance Graph & Versioned Claims.
Every claim bound to product version, market, evidence, and date.
THE WORK TODAY
“Is Product X compliant for the EU?” Today’s answer requires opening five systems and asking three people. PLM has the BOM. Certificate library has the test reports. Supplier portal has the declarations. Regulatory tracker has the obligations. None of them know the others. The answer is reconstructed every time the question is asked.
Five systems, three people, one reconstruction.
WHAT BLUEPRINT DOES
A canonical compliance graph stores every relationship as a typed object: Market → Regulation → Obligation → Evidence → Product (versioned) → Claim. Every claim is bound to a specific BOM revision, firmware version, label artwork version, packaging version, and effective date. The data model is the product. The AI is a component inside it.
The graph is the system of record.
WHAT’S LEFT FOR YOU
→ Review the claim. → Trust the data model. The graph is the system of record — not a folder, not a tracker. When the audit asks, the query produces the answer.
The query produces the answer.
Evidence Quality Scoring.
Beyond expiry. Does the evidence actually prove what it claims to prove.
THE WORK TODAY
Certificate library has 8,000 documents. Some are valid. Some are expired. Some are valid but worthless — the lab’s accreditation doesn’t cover the test method the regulation requires. The team doesn’t know which is which until the audit asks. The audit asks. Triage under pressure.
Triage at audit time. The expensive way to find out.
WHAT BLUEPRINT DOES
Every piece of evidence scored on multiple axes: → Lab accreditation scope → Test method match → Configuration match (was the exact variant tested?) → Document provenance → Declaration grade — compliance vs. marketing → Validity windows Quality is not yes/no — it’s a multi-axis score with the weak axes named.
Multi-axis score. Weak axes named.
WHAT’S LEFT FOR YOU
→ Trust the high-confidence evidence. → Investigate the medium-confidence pieces. → Replace the low-confidence ones before they fail an audit. Blueprint scores; you act on the scores.
Blueprint scores. You act.
Product-Change Impact Detection.
BOM, supplier, firmware, and packaging events as first-class compliance triggers.
THE WORK TODAY
Product change breaks compliance more often than regulatory change. A BOM revision swaps a capacitor. A supplier swap brings a new declaration. A firmware update changes RF behavior. A packaging redesign changes the recycling marks. Each event happens inside engineering, supply chain, or manufacturing systems — not inside the compliance system. Compliance learns weeks or months later. Sometimes never.
The change you didn’t know about is the audit you fail.
WHAT BLUEPRINT DOES
Connectors to PLM, ERP, AML, artwork management, release-notes systems. BOM revisions, supplier swaps, firmware updates, packaging redesigns, manufacturing process changes, undisclosed material changes — all generate Change Deltas. Each Delta cross-referenced against the canonical graph for every affected product+market. Tasks generated automatically: re-test, re-certify, relabel.
Hidden change → tracked task → regulatory impact on record.
WHAT’S LEFT FOR YOU
→ Review the generated tasks. → Assign owners and deadlines. The change is no longer a hidden compliance event — it is a tracked task with the regulatory impact on record.
Tracked task. Owner. Deadline. On record.
The remaining two. The watch layer at one end. The flagship output at the other.
Same pattern as the four deep-dives. Blueprint does the work; you decide what action it triggers.
Regulatory Surveillance
THE WORK TODAY
Newsletters, mailing lists, manual tracker spreadsheet. Nobody sure what was missed.
WHAT BLUEPRINT DOES
Continuous monitoring across markets. Updates scored for relevance to your specific portfolio. Semantic diff, not just “something changed.”
WHAT’S LEFT FOR YOU
Decide which updates require action. Blueprint surfaces; you decide.
Decision Pack Generation
THE WORK TODAY
CEO asks: are we ready to ship to Germany next week? Two days of reconstruction for a memo that’s stale the day after.
WHAT BLUEPRINT DOES
One artifact per product+variant+market. Domain status, confidence, required actions, evidence list, rationale, effective date. Regenerated when reality changes.
WHAT’S LEFT FOR YOU
Read the Pack. Send it. Sign the DoC if applicable. The answer is already there.
Three tiers of autonomy.
Every capability has a clear owner. When something goes wrong, we know who answers.
TIER 01
Autonomous
BLUEPRINT RUNS
Regulatory monitoring, semantic diff, product decomposition, graph maintenance with versioned claims, evidence ingestion, change-impact loop.
HUMAN ROLE
Review audit trails. Adjust feeds and decomposition templates as needed.
TIER 02
AI-assisted
BLUEPRINT DRAFTS
Mapping, classification (with sensitivity scores), evidence quality scoring, change-impact tasks, Decision Pack assembly.
HUMAN ROLE
Verify edge cases. SME signs off on high-sensitivity classifications. Output authoritative after human confirmation.
TIER 03
AI-informed
BLUEPRINT INFORMS
Foresight on upcoming regulations, cross-portfolio risk surfacing, market-entry impact simulations.
HUMAN ROLE
Make the decision. Blueprint never initiates submissions, signs declarations, or commits.
Compliance teams do the work that requires regulatory judgment. Blueprint does everything else.
Three engines. One audit chain.
Bid → Procurement → Compliance. The chain stays whole. The audit becomes one query.
BID ENGINE
Win the project.
→ Cost stack committed → Material assumptions → Supplier promises
PROCUREMENT ENGINE
Procure for it.
→ Vendor selection → Contract obligations → Component sourcing
COMPLIANCE ENGINE
Stay compliant.
→ Versioned claims → Evidence quality → Decision Pack
Customer RFP → Winning bid → Subcontractor selection → Component sourcing → Compliance evidence → Decision Pack. One chain. One query.
What Compliance Engine is not.
Five categories we deliberately do not enter. Plus three verticals on the v2 roadmap.
GRC platform
OneTrust · LogicGate · MetricStream · AuditBoard · ServiceNow GRC
Enterprise risk, policy, audit. We are the product layer next to them.
QMS
MasterControl · Greenlight Guru · Veeva Vault · Sparta TrackWise
Quality management. We subscribe to their change events.
PLM
PTC Windchill · Siemens Teamcenter · Oracle PLM · Aras
Engineering source of truth. We read BOM events from them.
Regulatory content
Enhesa · C2P · Intertek Insight · Assent
Reg databases. We consume their feeds, normalize into our graph.
Substance compliance
Assent · Source Intelligence · iPoint · Sphera · 3E
Supplier campaigns. We score the resulting evidence.
What is true today. What is in progress.
Current organizational controls and deployment safeguards, plus product-level certifications and attestations still in progress.
True today
→ Bloomteq ISO 27001 + ISO 9001:2015 (org-level) → EU data residency default → SaaS, dedicated tenant, on-premises → No training on customer data — contractual → TLS 1.3 + AES-256, customer-managed keys → SSO (SAML 2.0, OIDC), MFA, RBAC → Object-level permissions on products + Decision Packs → Tamper-evident audit logs (compliance artifact itself) → European-hosted models as default
In progress
Product-level SOC 2 Type I
Targeted H2 2026. Interim docs under NDA.
Product-level SOC 2 Type II
After Type I.
Product-level GDPR attestation
Follows SOC 2 schedule.
HIPAA, FedRAMP, IRAP
Not on v1 roadmap. Different vertical.
A compliance system that hallucinates is worse than one that does not exist. Deterministic decision logic + explicit rationales + human sign-off on high-sensitivity items.
A scoping conversation. 45 minutes, architect-to-architect.
Three things, in order. No pitch. An honest answer at the end.
01
We ask three things.
Your products, target markets, regulatory frameworks. Your existing GRC/QMS/PLM stack. Where the audit pain hits hardest.
02
We do not pitch.
No slides. No demo choreography. An architect's conversation about what Compliance Engine could honestly do in your environment.
03
We tell you if it's not a fit.
v1 is physical products only. If your pain is SaaS, fintech, or healthcare compliance, we say so — and put you on the v2 list.
“Their ability to combine strong engineering with clear product thinking made a real difference for our teams. Communication was smooth, delivery was consistent, and the results exceeded expectations.”
— Head of Engineering, Global Industrial Client
1/3 Where is compliance work breaking down?